I have done it a couple of times when we have opened up communication and collaboration with new external parties.
The biggest problem is actually not that it is cumbersome, but that I do not have a central overview of the permissions to verify that thay are right
Leila stated
an anonymous voted
an anonymous voted
Pascal voted
an anonymous voted
Christopher voted
an anonymous posted a new comment
an anonymous stated
an anonymous voted
Simon posted a new idea
Leila Rosenstrale
Going through and updating status of closed ideas according to our new way of working. New process works as follows:
1. When you post a new idea that we consider valid, we will label it 'Open to vote for', so that it can be shared with other users and start gathering votes
2. Ideas that are support-related, already exist in some manner or non-implemented ideas that are older than a year and that have not gathered enough votes will be Archived.
3. We keep some older ideas that we think are in line with something we are planning otherwise or that have gathered enough votes.
4. If there are duplication of ideas, we may archive one of them and keep another which can continue to gather votes.
5. Ideas that we are planning to implement will be moved into the category 'Accepted'